Also known as the yeti, the abominable snowman is said to be a hominid, or humanlike creature, that inhabits the Himalaya Mountains in Tibet, Nepal, Bhutan, Sikkim, and Mustang. There is great controversy over whether this creature exists, and controversy too among believers regarding whether the abominable snowman is actually several different species of hominid. Westerners generally believe that there is only one type of hominid in the Himalayas, while natives living in the region believe that there are many species.
Still, people who claim to have seen an abominable snowman describe it in similar ways. Except for height estimates that vary from 3 feet to 10 feet (.91m to 3.05m), the creature is said to have a stocky, muscular, tailless body covered in thick, short, coarse, reddish brown or black hair. Its face is either said to be hairless or so white as to make it seem hairless. The head is cone shaped, or slightly pointed. The creature also has apelike arms hanging down to its knees, which it sometimes uses to swing through the trees. Most of the time, however, the creature is said to walk on all fours while in the forest and on two legs while crossing open stretches of snow.
Despite eyewitness reports, many scholars think that the abominable snowman is a mythical creature. For more than two hundred years Tibetans have told stories of seeing two types of hominids, the meh-teh (“manlike not-a-man thing”) and the dzu-teh (“big thing”), in caves or deep thickets in Himalayan forests. In such tales the creature is depicted as a monster, uprooting tree trunks, raiding villages, and carrying off yaks and humans for food.
People who claim to have seen a real abominable snowman, though, describe no such behaviour. Instead, they tell of a highly reclusive, perhaps nocturnal, creature that avoids human contact and eats only plants.
The first written reference to such a creature appeared in 1832 in the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. B.H. Hodgson, a British subject living in Nepal, claimed that he had encountered a hairy, tailless biped while in northern Nepal; however, he concluded that he had seen an unusually large, upright orangutan (though these apes only live in the tropical jungles of Malaysia and Indonesia). In 1889 Major L.A. Waddell wrote in his book Among the Himalayas that native guides, known as Sherpas, had told stories of similar creatures and that he himself had seen a large humanlike footprint in the snows at an altitude of 17,000 feet (5,100m). The Sherpa told him it was yeh-teh (“that thing”), an ape-man who had long inhabited the area. Like Hodgson, though, Waddell dismissed the notion that the print had been made by anything but a known animal. He decided the print had been made by a massive bear.
In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Westerners visiting the Himalayas continued to report seeing huge humanlike footprints, sometimes as large as 2 feet (.609m) long, at altitudes above 13,000 feet (3,900m). The first such account to be taken seriously by Westerners was that of Lieutenant Colonel C.K. Howard-Bury, who was on a 1921 reconnaissance expedition to Mount Everest. While climbing from Kharta to Lhakpa La
in Tibet, he spotted several dark figures at an elevation far above his own. The distance was too great to make out any details about these figures, but he guessed them to be men. Later, in a snowfield at an altitude of 20,000 feet (6,096m), he found seemingly human footprints. Yet because these prints were three times the size of a man’s and appeared to have been made by a naked foot rather than by a boot, he could not believe they were human. Instead, he speculated that the figures he had seen had actually been large gray wolves and that the footprints’ humanlike shape had been caused by double tracks and distortions of soft snow. His Sherpa porters, however, disagreed. They told him that the footprints were from beasts they called meh-teh kang-mi (“manlike not-a-man creatures”). When Howard-Bury mistakenly wrote these words as metoh kang-mi (“snow creatures”) in his official report of the incident, and a newspaper reporter from the Calcutta Statesman newspaper mistranslated
Howard-Bury’s words as “abominable snowman,” the Himalayan hominid received the name by which Westerners
would come to know it.
It was not until four years later, however, that the abominable snowman became well known throughout the Western world, thanks to media reports of a sighting by a British photographer with the Royal Geographical Society.
While at an altitude of 15,000 feet (4,500m) near the Zemu glacier in the Himalayas, photographer N.A. Tombazi spotted a dark, hairy, and naked humanlike figure walking about 200 to 300 yards (183 to 274m) away from him, occasionally uprooting bushes and plants as it walked.
Eventually the creature disappeared into heavy brush. When Tombazi reached the area he saw sixteen human-shaped footprints, about 6 to 7 inches (15.3 to 17.8cm) long and 4 inches (10.1cm) wide, in the snow. He was certain that these tracks had been made by a biped as yet unknown to scientists.
In 1970, on the Himalayan mountain of Annapurna, similar tracks were found by British mountaineer Don Whillans, who also claimed to have seen an apelike creature walking upright in the moonlight near his campsite and to have heard an odd cry that his Sherpa guides said was its call.
Other notable sightings include that of American mountaineer Craig Calonica— who, in September 1998, claimed to have seen two abominable snowmen walking together on the side of Mount Everest— and Italian mountaineer Reinhold Messner—who, in 1986 and 1997, made four sightings in the Himalayas and claimed to have photographed the creature’s footprints. Numerous other mountaineers and some zoologists claim they have seen and/or photographed abominable snowman footprints in the Himalayas as well.
Perhaps the best-known abominable snowman photograph was taken by mountaineer Eric Shipton in 1951 at an altitude of 18,000 feet (5,486m). It shows a humanlike print more than 9 inches (22.9cm) in length and resembles other footprints found by zoologist Edward Cronin in 1972. By some estimates, a human with a print this size would be more than 8 feet (2.4m) tall. Nonetheless, skeptics suggest that it could have been made by a human, perhaps a trickster wanting to convince the world that abominable snowmen are real. Skeptics dismiss other hominid photographs as well, attributing them to fraud or to misidentification. Indeed, some photographs taken by Englishman Tony Wooldridge in March 1986, while he was traveling alone through the Himalayas in India, caused quite a sensation until experts concluded that the photos were actually pictures of a rock formation that Wooldridge had apparently mistaken for a stationary man-beast.
Also believed to be frauds or misidentifications are various abominable snowman remains that have been found in various parts of Tibet and Nepal, including supposed yeti pelts, scalps, skeletons, and hands. Consequently, there is no undisputed evidence that the abominable snowman is real. However, given the number and the credibility of witness reports, some scientists suspect that the creature does indeed exist. Those who think the abominable snowman is real hypothesize that it is some sort of evolutionary link between apes and humans, though they disagree on just how closely related to humans this creature might be. They have also speculated that this creature has survived from prehistoric times not only in the Himalayas but also in other parts of the world, where people have sighted similar hominids, such as the North American Sasquatch or bigfoot.
The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Paranormal Phenomena – written by Patricia D. Netzley © 2006 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning
When most people ponder on the “big three” of cryprozoology, they are thinking of the Loch Ness Monsters, Bigfoot, and the Abominable Snowman. Though many assume these beasts to be mythical, a body of intriguing evidence exists for each. Of the three, the Abominable Snowman is the cryptozoological animal longest known and discussed in the West.
The more proper name is Yeti, but most Westerners have been more familiar with the moniker” Abominable Snowman.” “Abominable Snowman” is a phrase coined, accidentally, by a Calcutta Statesman newspaper columnist, Henry Newman, in 1921.
It happened when Newman wrote about the 1921 sighting by Lieutenant Colonel (later Sir) C. K. Howard-Bury and his party, who saw dark forms moving about on a twenty-thousand-foot-high snowfield above their location, the Lhapka-La pass on the Tibetan side of the Himalayan mountains, and viewed them through binoculars. This is the first credible Western sighting of what until then had been mostly a shadowy tale (at least to Westerners) of strange, hairy upright creatures in Tibet, Bhutan, Sikkim, Mustang, and Nepal. Howard-Bury would later, on
September 22, 1921, find footprints “three times those of normal humans” at the site where the dark forms were moving about.
The Sherpas insisted that the prints were those of the metoh-kangmz; as Howard-Bury rendered it. Kang-mi loosely means “snow creature.”
The meloh part should have been written as met-teb, which translates as “man-sized wild creature.”
Newman’s mistake was caused in pare by Howard-Bury’s mistransliteration of the Sherpa word. Howard-Bury did not understand that the Sherpas recognized several types of creatures; on this occasion they had used a generic, not a specific, term. The error was compounded when Newman changed Howard-Bury’s metoh.kangmi to meteh kangml~
which he explained as a Tibetan word meaning” Abominable Snowman.”
In any case, this proved to be a pivotal event in cryptozoological history. As Ivan T. Sanderson wrote, “The result was like the explosion of an atomic bomb.” The melodramatic name” Abominable Snowman” spurred gigantic press interest. Newspaper coverage multiplied as more and more expeditions sought to climb Mount Everest.
The true origin of the phrase “Abominable Snowman” has been misrepresented over the years. For example, on a 1992 episode of the television series Unsolved Mysterties, a well· known Irish explorer wrongly claimed that the creature got its name because of its horrible odor.
The real animal behind the name is neither abominable nor a true creature of the snows. These beasts usually appear to Jive in quiet retreat in the steamy mountain valleys of the Himalayas, using the snowy passes as a way to move from one spot to another, leaving behind huge mysterious footprints. They are not-contrary to another
widespread misunderstanding-white. And they are not a single creature.
A better generic term for Abominable Snowman is the Sherpa yet/~ loosely meaning “that there thing.” Yetis are known as huge creatures-humanoid beasts, covered with thick coats of dark fur with arms, like those of anthropoid apes, which reach down to their knees.
The Encyclopedia of Loch Monsters,Sasquatch, Chupacabras, and Other Authentic Mysteries of Nature
Written by Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark – Copyright 1999 Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark
Abominable Snowman : English name for the YETI of Central Asia.
Coined by Calcutta Statesman columnist Henry Newman in 1921 as a translation of the Sherpa (Sino Tibetan) METOHKANGMI, which a telegraphist miscoded as “Metch kangmi.” Newman claimed it meant “abominable snowman.” The phrase became a popular term with journalists from the 1920s through the 1960s. The name does not come from the creature’s supposed horrible odor, as some have alleged. The term also serves as a generic name for unknown Asian hominids.
Himalaya Mountains of Nepal and Tibet.
Further Reading and Sources:
- Charles K. Howard-Bury, Mount Everest: The Reconnaissance, 1921 (London: Edward Arnold, 1922), p. 241;
- Henry Newman, Indian Peepshow (London: G. Bell and Sons, 1937), pp. 156–160;
- Ralph Izzard, The Abominable Snowman (Garden City, N.Y.:Doubleday, 1955), pp. 28–29.